• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
Women's Legacy Project
  • Home
  • About
  • How To Curate
  • Our Collective Legacy
  • Writing Online Memoir
  • Blog
Women's Legacy Project > Blog > CREATE > Blogging & Writing > Arizona Democrats Grow Ovaries, Balls, and a Spine

Arizona Democrats Grow Ovaries, Balls, and a Spine

Written by: womenslegacy
Published: November 20, 2005 -- Last Modified: November 20, 2005
No comments yet

At the AZ Democratic Party Committee Meetings yesterday in Tucson a miraculous transformation occurred. Women grew ovaries, men grew balls, and several slumped figures straightened with regenerated spines.

The Democrats supported a resolution submitted by Sherry Bohlen, State Committee Member from District 8 – Maricopa County to: Resolution Demanding an Inquiry of Iraq War Abuses. That one speaks for itself and unanimously passed,

Because of the amazing loaves and fish performances of voting machines (precincts with hundreds of registered voters recording thousands of votes) in various locations during the last few elections, a lot of folks now know that there are some very serious flaws with the current electronics and mechanics of our voting system. Rev. Gerry Straatemeier introduced the Resolution For Public Oversity and Transparency of Arizona Elections to Block Purchase of DRE Voting Machines. Lively discussion and significant support were initially forthcoming from the floor. Then a single voice forwarded an ammendment that would have sent the resolution to committee. At that point things livened up quite a lot! Shouting, gesturing, and disgruntled murmuring erupted and after some rather less than adept handling of parlimentary procedure that amendment was soundly voted down and the discussion of the resolution as submitted was then soundly supported by an impressively aubible majority.

It is good to see progressive folks in significant numbers at such events — without them it would probably be business as usual. Folks from No More Deaths/No Mas Muertes as well as CODEPINK Tucson and CODEPINK Phoenix were there working the crowds.

The stated concern with the amendment was that too many issues were addressed in the resolution that (paraphrased — very long document…) stated that because:

  • AZ Democrats support the fundamental right to vote
  • the pivotal juncture this time presents
  • the HAVA Act requires a permanent paper record, and that the voter is provided with opportunity to change or correct any error before the permanent record is produced and the paper record will be available as an official record for any recount
  • AZ has laws that prevent required hand counts
  • the Secretary of State has consolidated partisan privatized control of elections in AZ and violated HAVA
  • the GAO has reported that concerns about electronic voting have been realized in recent elections with the loss and miscount of votes
  • electronic voting equipment is inherently subject to programming error, equipment malfunction and malicious tampering
  • Secretary of State has opposed amendments requiring paper ballots
  • and that she deceptively brought forth representatives of the blind community who stated that paper ballot would disnfranchise the blind
  • suppressed another vendor option with paper ballot production better met have and the needs of the entire disabled community
  • she has failed to post required lists for decertification of machines
  • she has refused to release such a list
  • she has developed no procedure to decertify machines in Maricopa County demonstrated to have an 18.3% error rate
  • she is using a media campaign to attempt to squelch legal action rather than addressing the problems brought to light by the lawsuit
  • she has failed to provid the transparent election evaluation procedure required by law
  • she promotes private vendor meetings with state and county election officials without public representation
  • she has canceled public meetings called to find out who serves on the state certification committee and postponed meetings with vendors other than Diebold
  • Florida and other states report unexpected financial consequenced integrating Diebold systems with other systems

that the AZ Democratic Party (and officials) will pursue every option to:

  • work to be sure 2006 elections are transparent, auditable, and will restore voter confidence
  • advocate for public oversight and ownership of elections that will protect voting from fraud (security breaches) and machine error
  • will support legislation to require voter verified paper ballots, require hand counted audits of randomly selected precincts
  • improve reports, auditing and certification of equipment
  • act to hold the Secretary of State accountable for actions that demonstrate a lack of transparency and to challenge state contracts to Diebold for DRE machines
  • demand state contracts awards require vendors to upgrade to Hava Standards
  • compel SoS to produce written decertification standards and immediately decertify faulty voting equipment
  • sponsor public forums to expose flaws of electronic voting, examine adverse consequence of “blended voting systems,” discover hidden costs associated with training poll workers to implement a dual voting system, evaluate certification/decertification standards set by the SoS, educate the public to participate in public oversight of county board of elections
  • work with representatives of disability advocacy groups to ensure voting systems are HAVA compliant for the widest variety of diabilities

Usually I find such lengthy documents to be nap inducing, but when we are talking about the “Katherine Harris” of Arizona who was one of the several SoS’s with glaring conflicts of interest in that they helped to run State Republican Campaigns while also supposedly overseeing the impartiality of elections in that same state.

This issue deserves a lot more coverage in corporate media than it has received — so I guess it is up to citizen and indy media to get the issue out there — so Democrats can’t react to chill temperatures by shrivelling up.

arizona
voting
progressive
Democrats
Jan Brewer

buildpeace.blogspot.com

Categories: Blogging & WritingTags: Blogging & Writing

Support Independent Bookstores - Visit IndieBound.org
Previous Post: « Propaganda American Style
Next Post: Unlikely Allies — CODEPINK and Murtha »

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

CommentLuv badgeShow more posts

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Footer

Recent Posts

  • Ending, and Beginning
  • For Our Daughters
  • Stand and Write
  • Context and Little Things
  • A Month is Just a Month… as Time Goes By
  • Processing Two Very Different Deaths
  • A Dehydrated and Delusional Friend Found Wandering in 100° Heat
  • About Women’s Legacy & Hill Research
  • Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

Archives

Powered by
  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • LinkedIn
  • Pinterest
  • Twitter
View my Flipboard Magazine.

© 2023, Nancy Hill, Women's Legacy Project of Hill Research Services, LLC

This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish.Accept Reject Read More
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT